000 04129cam a2200601 i 4500
001 9781003091462
003 FlBoTFG
005 20220724194354.0
006 m d | |
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200707t20212021nyu ob 001 0 eng
040 _aOCoLC-P
_beng
_erda
_cOCoLC-P
020 _a9781003091462
_qelectronic book
020 _a1003091466
_qelectronic book
020 _a9781000281903
_qelectronic book
020 _a1000281906
_qelectronic book
020 _a9781000281927
_qelectronic book
020 _a1000281922
_qelectronic book
020 _a1000281884
_qelectronic book
020 _a9781000281880
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z9780367549848
_qhardcover
020 _z9780367549855
_qpaperback
035 _a(OCoLC)1164823112
035 _a(OCoLC-P)1164823112
050 0 4 _aLB2333
_b.C57 2021
072 7 _aEDU
_x011000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aEDU
_x015000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aEDU
_x030000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aJNM
_2bicssc
082 0 0 _a371.14/4
_223
100 1 _aClayson, Dennis E.,
_eauthor.
245 1 2 _aA comprehensive critique of student evaluation of teaching :
_bcritical perspectives on validity, reliability, and impartiality /
_cDennis E. Clayson.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_bRoutledge,
_c2021.
264 4 _c©2021
300 _a1 online resource (viii, 151 pages).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aRoutledge research in higher education
500 _a"Routledge Focus" -- taken from front cover.
505 0 _aIssues and debates surrounding student evaluations of teaching -- Potential impacts of gender bias on student evaluations -- The influence of personality traits on student evaluations -- Halo effects impacting on student evaluations -- Questioning the truthfulness of student evaluations -- Rigor, grades and how they impact on student evaluations -- The association between student learning and student evaluations -- Student evaluations and the improvement of instruction -- Challenging the statistical reliability of student evaluations -- Traditional validity and SET -- Identifying valid applications of SET -- Validity and the impacts of subjectivity -- Introducing a likability hypothesis -- Justifications of the likability hypothesis -- Conclusion and recommendations : the future of SET.
520 _a"This thought-provoking volume offers comprehensive analysis of contemporary research and literature on student evaluation of teaching (SET) in Higher Education. In evaluating data from fields including education, psychology, engineering, science, and business, this volume critically engages with the assumption that SET is a reliable and valid measure of effective teaching. Clayson navigates a range of cultural, social, and era-related factors including gender, grades, personality, student honesty, and halo effects to consider how these may impact on the accuracy and impartiality of student evaluations. Ultimately, he posits a "popularity hypothesis", asserting that above all, SET measures instructor likability. While controversial, the hypothesis powerfully and persuasively draws on extensive and divergent literature to offer new and salient insights regarding the growing and potentially misleading phenomenon of SET. This topical and transdisciplinary book will be of great interest to researchers, faculty, and administrators in the fields of higher education management, administration, teaching and learning"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650 0 _aCollege teachers
_xRating of.
650 0 _aCollege teaching
_xEvaluation.
650 0 _aStudent evaluation of teachers.
650 7 _aEDUCATION / Evaluation
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aEDUCATION / Higher
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aEDUCATION / Testing & Measurement
_2bisacsh
856 4 0 _3Read Online
_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003091462
856 4 2 _3OCLC metadata license agreement
_uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
942 _2lcc
_cEBK
999 _c16837
_d16837