000 03330cam a22005418i 4500
001 9780429426803
003 FlBoTFG
005 20220724194248.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 191205s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng
040 _aOCoLC-P
_beng
_erda
_cOCoLC-P
020 _a9780429426803
_q(ebook)
020 _a0429426801
_q(ebook)
020 _a9780429762086
_q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020 _a0429762089
_q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020 _a9780429762079
_q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020 _a0429762070
_q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020 _z9781138386488
_q(hardback)
035 _a(OCoLC)1130327231
035 _a(OCoLC-P)1130327231
050 0 0 _aHG3891
072 7 _aSOC
_x008000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aSOC
_x053000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aGTF
_2bicssc
082 0 0 _a332/.0424
_223
100 1 _aGemici, Kurtuluş,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aCapital mobility and distributional conflict in Chile, South Korea, and Turkey /
_cKurtuluş Gemici.
250 _aFirst Edition.
264 1 _aNew York :
_bRoutledge,
_c2020.
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aRoutledge studies in development economics
520 _a"Why did many emerging countries pursue risky financial opening policies in a reckless manner, even after the painful example of the Latin American debt crisis? Unlike trade liberalization, which has mostly been beneficial in emerging countries, the removal of capital controls has led to boom-bust patterns in many countries. It is not simply driven by class or sectoral interests, nor is it just a result of ideational changes in policy-making circles, or international pressure. Gemici argues that to fully understand the motivation for these policies, we need to take into account distributional struggles prior to their enactment. In this book, Gemici shows that conflictual distributional relations significantly increase the likelihood of capital account liberalization. Through in-depth comparative case studies, he also demonstrates that countries which liberalize in the most comprehensive manner tend to be the countries characterized by a high degree of distributional conflict. The case studies - Argentina, Chile, South Korea , and Turkey - have been chosen to maximise variation in distributional relations and to escape regional clustering, showing quite different trajectories of capital account liberalization. This will be of great interest to readers in sociology, international political economy and heterodox economics, as well as specialists in the countries examined"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650 0 _aCapital movements
_zChile.
650 0 _aCapital movements
_zKorea (South)
650 0 _aCapital movements
_zTurkey.
650 0 _aFree trade.
650 0 _aDistribution (Economic theory)
651 0 _aChile
_xEconomic conditions
_y1988-
650 7 _aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Ethnic Studies / General
_2bisacsh
856 4 0 _3Read Online
_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429426803
856 4 2 _3OCLC metadata license agreement
_uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
942 _2lcc
_cEBK
999 _c15574
_d15574